In article
mark@myinboxisbroken.com says...
> Gordon Sollars wrote:
>
> > So, once again, you go back to the definition of certainty that you have
> > claimed to reject: all the evidence in favor and none against. [...]
>
> That supposed criterion for certainty is so *ridiculous* that it's
> really an insult to attribute it to anyone -- unless the person in
> question has actually stated that that's his criterion.
Oh, come now, Mark, you have seen much worse insults here on HPO. ;-)
I invited Fred to qualify his statement, but he wants to play games. If
he had a clear notion of certainty, it would be much easier for him to
state it than for me to google his posts.
--
Gordon