soc.culture.asian.american

In "Mohammed Cartoons, Part II?"
Lauren Keane wrote in the Washington Post:

> Every Friday for the past few weeks, embassies
> in Kabul have told foreign nationals to prepare
> for a rerun of the 2005 Mohammed cartoon riots.
> Back then, mobs attacked Western businesses
> and embassies across the Islamic world to protest
> images in a Danish newspaper that depicted the
> Prophet Mohammed with a bomb in his turban.
> This time the potential affront is a film made by
> right-wing Dutch politician Geert Wilders, in which
> he denounces Islam's Koran as a "fascist" book
> that "incites people to murder." Rumors put out
> by the Wilders camp suggest he burns a copy of
> the Koran in the film.

> Both cartoon and film (due to be released next
> month) are clearly crass and self-serving exercises
> that pay lip service to the idea of freedom of speech
> while being little more than vehicles for xenophobia.

Question: Is denouncing NAZI literature as
"fascist" and "inciting people to murder" ...
"clearly crass and self-serving exercises that
pay lip service to the idea of freedom of
speech while being little more than vehicles
for xenophobia?"

Surely the Answer must be that such a
denunciation is either true or false, and
therefore worthy or worthless.

Well, while Hitler could be held responsible for
the murders of up to 65 million human beings,
there are some places in India ALONE where
up to 35 million souls were butchered under
the sanctions of The Koran. The toll of the
Islamic genocide is in the hundreds of millions
of human beings and it is still ongoing with no
end in sight (and that doesn't even begin to take
into consideration the countless civilizations,
including all the Christian ones which once
thrived in and around the fertile crescent, that
were utterly obliterated by Islam... leaving
behind the monstrous ruin and despair you see
today everywhere in the Muslim world there).
Butchery and murder are the school agenda of
most Islamic children and the teachings of hate
never end across the lifetimes of Muslims the
world over... with the possible exception only
of those who have not been converted to Islam
long enough to have yet lost the values of their
previous "human" cultures (as in Thailand, in
Malaysia, in Indonesia, etc.)

VISIT THOU: http://islamisbad.com

Is it possible to libel Mohammed? Could anything
bad enough or objectionable enough ever be said
of this incomprehensibly reprehensible creep which
he himself did not surpass many, many, many
times over with his own vile criminal behavior and
unimaginable personal degradation... as recorded
by his own proud Islamic biographers? VISIT THOU:

http://islamisbad.com/islamicterrorism.html

S D Rodrian
http://poems.sdrodrian.com
http://physics.sdrodrian.com
http://mp3s.sdrodrian.com

All religions are local.
Only science is universal.