soc.culture.asian.american

On Mar 25, 9:11=A0pm, Yu wrote:
> On Mar 26, 11:19=A0am, bmo...@nyx.net wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Mar 25, 4:28=A0pm, ni...@nizuy.com wrote:
>
> > > On Tue, 25 Mar 2008 13:47:41 -0700 (PDT), bmo...@nyx.net wrote:
> > > >On Mar 25, 2:36?pm, ni...@nizuy.com wrote:
> > > >> On Tue, 25 Mar 2008 12:59:55 -0700 (PDT), bmo...@nyx.net wrote:
> > > >> >On Mar 25, 1:46?pm, ni...@nizuy.com wrote:
> > > >> >> On Tue, 25 Mar 2008 12:23:44 -0700 (PDT), bmo...@nyx.net wrote:
> > > >> >> >On Mar 25, 6:56?am, ni...@nizuy.com wrote:
> > > >> >> >> On Tue, 25 Mar 2008 08:34:21 -0400, "J.Venning" hoo.dk>
> > > >> >> >> wrote:
>
> > > >> >> >> >"Yu" wrote in message
> > > >> >> >> >news:495cca58-4959-4b71-bad6-1b28c97c281d@c19g2000prf.google=
groups.com...
> > > >> >> >> >>CIA runs a secret operations. It sort of piggy back onto va=
rious
> > > >> >> >> >>organizations. 50% of the State Department may be CIA but t=
hey don't tell
> > > >> >> >> >>you. In fact is illegal to tell you.
>
> > > >> >> >> > ? ?If the CIA were really that secret, how did you get hold=
of this
> > > >> >> >> >information?
> > > >> >> >> >J.
>
> > > >> >> >> Because CIA not only does a secret war of subversion, but als=
o does a
> > > >> >> >> psychological war of intimidation. They love to boast their e=
vil deeds
> > > >> >> >> all around the world.
>
> > > >> >> >So they told you and then they had to castrate you? That explai=
ns a
> > > >> >> >lot.
>
> > > >> >> No, that only explains your sick mind and bizarre comprehension.=
How
> > > >> >> do you reach your conclusion based on what I said is only anyone=
's
> > > >> >> guess.
>
> > > >> >Because you claim to know about CIA "boasting" which of course is =
just
> > > >> >you being an idiot. You know nothing of it.
>
> > > >> If that is what you truly think, you are more stupid than I thought=
.
> > > >> It's not a matter of knowing. It's a matter of witnessing.
>
> > > >You did not witness CIA agents boasting about anything. It is all in
> > > >your head.
>
> > > Not the agents, but the "former" agents.
>
> > You think the Dalai Lama is a violent person. That's absurd, and it
> > pretty much kills your credibility. Now you tell us that you have
> > witnessed former CIA agents boasting. Why should we believe you? It
> > was probably some drunk in a bar and you believed him because that is
> > what you wanted to hear.
>
> For a long time the Dalai Lama and his gov in exile denied and CIA
> involvement in Tibet. With all the killing going on for 20 years he
> really didn't know??
> In 1973 his gov in exile was involved in the assassination of a
> political rival.
> He also claim not to know anything.

There are a lot of claims out there. Yu swallows all claims that make
the Dalai Lama look bad, and rejects all claims that make the Chinese
government look bad. The situation is not simple but Yu treats it that
way. But one thing for sure: the Chinese government imposes lots of
control on the Tibetans practice of Buddhism. That's a truth that
stands out starkly despite the weasel words of our resident stooges.

Hey Yu, if you were beaten up for practicing your religion, do you
think that would be OK? What if some stooge said that you were not
getting beaten up, even though you were black and blue? If for once in
your life you imagined the shoe on the other foot it might do you
good. Because right now you, like LT Lee, sound like simple-minded
apologists for the Chinese government.